Jennifer Mascott
Over the course of her career, Mascott has promoted an expansive view of executive authority, including shielding presidents from accountability.
Over the course of her career, Mascott has promoted an expansive view of executive authority, including shielding presidents from accountability.
Based on his history of inflammatory rhetoric and the work he has done throughout his legal career, he erodes critical rights and legal protections.
Mizelle epitomizes another unqualified judge selected for her extreme conservative beliefs.
Brasher was nominated because he will be a reliable vote on the bench to advance ultraconservative policies.
Several of Luck’s previous decisions raise concerns that he will side with the wealthy and powerful at the expense of everyday Americans.
Kyle Duncan has spent his career fighting against reproductive rights and LGBTQ equality, defending discriminatory voting laws, and dismantling protections for immigrants.
Stras has a deeply disturbing record of repeatedly showcasing his far-right leanings.
Scudder worked at the DOJ and White House during the Bush Administration’s concerning stances on executive power and civil liberties.
Dhillon's ardent loyalism to President Trump demonstrates her commitment to executing his agenda, not serving as an independent check on power abuses by the wealthy and powerful.
Walker's extreme views on unchecked presidential authority are more dangerous than ever.
Grant's record shows evidence of a narrow-minded, elitist approach to cases that raises serious concerns about undermining critical rights and legal protections.
Bress has proudly advanced President Trump's far-right agenda and acted as a reliable ideologue on the bench.